LinkedIn performs no public function, account restrictions cannot be challenged through writs: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging LinkedIn's account restriction, holding that LinkedIn and its resident grievance officer are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court determined that social media platforms do not perform public functions, leaving users to pursue remedies through civil suits for damages. The case involved a user whose account was restricted without clear explanation of violations, with appeals receiving only templated responses.
Key points
- LinkedIn account restrictions not subject to constitutional writ petitions under Article 226
- Court held LinkedIn does not perform public functions
- Users must pursue civil remedies for account disputes
Summary and key points written by AI from the headline and a short excerpt, so they can be incomplete or wrong. MediaNama did the reporting; read the original for the full story.
Read the full story at MediaNama
