Does intelligence need a hard cap?
A Platformer opinion column examines an emerging debate about imposing intelligence caps on large language models as a safety measure, prompted by discussions at an AI industry conference.
Columns, editorials and think pieces from across the industry.
A Platformer opinion column examines an emerging debate about imposing intelligence caps on large language models as a safety measure, prompted by discussions at an AI industry conference.
An EFF commentary opposing the DEFEND IP Act and similar site-blocking proposals, arguing they enable censorship and collateral harm to lawful speech rather than protecting intellectual property.
A commentator critiques Wall Street Journal coverage of AI's projected economic impact, arguing that most projected GDP growth comes from data center infrastructure investment rather than AI applications themselves.
Opinion piece reconsiders predictions about AI agent management, finding that brute-force improvements in ML solve coordination problems without elaborate human-designed systems.
EFF argues San Francisco's retention of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) surveillance with weak safeguards fails to protect civil liberties and will not prevent documented harms.
EFF opposes San Francisco Police Department's new drone policy, arguing it provides inadequate privacy protections and risks enabling widespread unaccountable surveillance.
EFF filed an amicus brief arguing Trump's use of Truth Social's paid early-access scheme violates First Amendment rights to equal access of official government statements.
Opinion piece argues that current AI systems like GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 are already capable of transformative economic impact despite ongoing debates about future risks and regulation.